| The Bulbul |
| Natural History Books - The Birds of Calcutta by Frank Finn (1904) | |
| Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:06 | |
|
"The Bulbul, which did chase the jewelled butterflies.” Arnold.
CONSIDERING what a charming and characteristic feature
butterflies form in the tropical landscape, it would not be
much to the Bulbul’ s credit if chasing them were his most
noteworthy occupation. Undoubtedly he does catch but-
terflies sometimes, for I once saw a wild Bulbul with one
in his bill not “jewelled,” but plain white and he will
eat them readily enough in confinement.
But on the
other hand, fruit is undoubtedly his more ordinary food ;
a certain Lantana bush I wot of is much resorted to by
both Bulbuls and butterflies, and the berries seem to be
the, birds’ only object in visiting it. And captive Bulbul
display an indiscriminateness in taste as regards the species
of butterflies they devour, that would shock many of the
exponents of ‘ ‘ warning colouration in insects ;’ ‘ eating,
without the stimulus of hunger, species which other birds
will avoid unless they have no choice allowed. This may
be interpreted in two ways. Either the Bulbul is such a
common bird because he doesn’t care what he eats ; or he
is a mere amateur in butter fly -eating, and doesn’t know
what’s good, like a young bird who has his experience to
gain. Certainly his insect-catching when at liberty is
mostly concerned with smaller game, for it is not always
easy to see what he takes when he rises in the air a short
distance and then drops back to his perch. For he is a bird
of varied abilities ; he can skip about gracefully among the
branches of a shrub, though he is more given to sitting on
the top ; and on the wing his movements, though not
particularly powerful or swift, are easy and graceful to a
degree. Only on the ground is he awkward, for his legs
are too short for him to hop with much agility or keep his
tail clear ; but he does not often descend to earth, and
wisely. No small bird looks well on the ground unless he
can run, like the wagtail, and even then he is rather insig-
nificant. But place the Bulbul as one generally sees him,
on a lofty spray, his jetty crest erect, and his tail drooping
in a neglige manner all his own, and it is difficult to find a
small bird so picturesque.
True, his black fore-quarters
fade off to dusty brown on the wings and iron-grey on the
breast, and the only bright colour he boasts is the silky
crimson patch modestly concealed under the root of his
tail ; but even so he is more strikingly attired than most
European birds. Both cock and hen are also equally well
dressed ; but the young are duller and look rather shabby,
especially as they have to wear a rusty-buff escutcheon
instead of a blood-red one. This curiously-placed bit of
colour seems a family feature with Bulbuls ; it is always
either red or yellow, however, when it occurs at all, other
tints being strictly barred. The only Bulbul which occurs
in Europe in the Cyclades bears a yellow patch, being
otherwise of a snuffy brown ; and this is possibly the bird
which has got mixed up with the Nightingale in Eastern
poetry, as it occurs in Palestine, and is there called Bulbul
by the Arabs. Bulbul in Persian is always supposed to
mean the true Nightingale, the lover of the rose, and there
seems to be no reason to doubt the correctness of the iden-
tification though it may be mentioned that the Persian
nightingale (Daulias golzii) is not absolutely identical with
the European bird. More to the point are the facts that
the Yarkandis call the Barred Warbler (Sylvia nisoria)
the Bulbul, and that the Palestine Bulbul (Pycnonotus
xanthopygus) above alluded to is a really fine singer. So
that whatever bird was called by the name to start with,
it seems to be about as indefinite among Orientals as
4 ‘ Mocking-bird ‘ ‘ and ‘ ‘ Sparrow ‘ ‘ are in our own lan-
guage. However, in India “ Bulbul “ is taken by both
natives and Europeans in a very definite signification for
a large group of pretty birds, of which our dark Bengal
species (Molpastes bengalensis) may very fairly claim to be
the type.
He certainly is not much of a songster, but his
notes are never harsh and always singularly cheerful and
liquid, conveying an unequivocal sense of happiness and
well-being ; and he is a thoroughly nice bird. He is nofc obtrusively sociable nor peevishly solitary and quarrel- some ; when the natives make him fight, it is by showing two hungry birds a morsel of food, over which of course there is a conflict. It is for this purpose that he is so often kept tame, tied to a cloth -padded, T-shaped iron perch by a long string connected with a soft thread round bis body. Fortunately, he does not seem to get much damaged in these fights, and at the end of the winter, the bulbul- fighting season, he is released, unless he has proved himself an exceptional champion and worth reserving for future triumphs. It is a shame to make use of his courage in this way, for he is really a plucky bird, and will even beat off a crow from his nest, although not more than half as large again as a sparrow himself. The said nest is an open one placed in a bush, and has nothing particularly remark- able about it. The eggs, however, are very pretty, being pinky-white with red spots, a common colour in the family.
Young Bulbuls taken just as their tails begin to grow are
easily reared and become very tame, making most charm-
ing pets ; I had one which was allowed full liberty, and
was at times quite a nuisance by its determination to
follow me about. The Bulbul, indeed, seems to have a
warm heart, although as above noted not fussily affec-
tionate with its kind ; a well known English authority on
cage birds has recorded that a male Bulbul in his posses-
sion had his paternal instincts so quickened by witnessing
the rearing of a brood of American Blue Robins (Sialia
sialis) in the same aviary that he insisted on taking a
helping hand, and even murderously attacked the real
father for not altogether resigning in his favour. This, indeed, might be considered as carrying matters rather too far, but after all the poor bird was no worse than any other ‘ well meaning person.”
|
|
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:06 |
